We are almost there. You have worked your way through the presentation and you know how to present it. But, the proof of the pudding is in eating it. Organizing a few mock-interviews can complete your preparation. These simulations provide the outsider’s feedback on your presentation and answers. With this feedback you can finetune your story, slides, and answers. But even more important is the pre-exposure mock-interviews provide. During the confrontation with the mock-panel, you will experience the same type of stress responses that the actual interview will evoke. This pre-exposure helps to better cope with the real interview itself.
Organizing a mock-interview
Mock-interviews are not automatically constructive. They can deprive you of self-confidence when mock-panel members are too critical without giving advice for how to improve things. Also, they can give you the wrong impression of what the panel expects. And, often different pieces of feedback contradict each other.
Here are a few guidelines that can help you to organize effective mock-interviews:
The right panel
The most easy thing is to invite your direct colleagues. Be aware that the actual panel will be much broader. With a too narrow mock-panel, you usually harvest detailed questions about methodology from their specific perspective. The actual panel is much broader and might also ask broader questions, or detailed questions from unexpected angles.
Organize both the generic and specific questions. You can try to have both generalists and specilists on the mock panel. Or you organize one (or two) mock-interview with panel members far from your field and one (or two) with an audience close to your field. If possible, try to involve people who were in ERC panels themselves or at least who have been interviewed themselves.
More is not per se better. Usually a group of three panel members plus someone who analyses what you do (can be someone from the supporting staff, or a coach) without participating in the discussion is enough.
Ideally you involve people with experience as ERC panel member or ERC interviewee. If you do not have them in your network, probably you know panel members or interviewees who have first-hand experience with other grants. Their lived-experience will be of much added value.
Assign roles
Ask one panel member to act as a chairperson. Ideally this person has experience as an ERC panel member or as an interviewee. The chair explains the procedure beforehand, discusses the questions to be asked by whom and in which order, welcomes you to the room, stop you if you run out of time (or not and record how much extra time you needed so you know how much to cut), and say good bye at the end of the interview. Next to the chair, you can also assign the roles of the panel member with distance to the field who asks broad questions about e.g. impact and leadership skills, and specialists asking the detailed methodology-oriented questions.
As realistic as possible
Do your research on how the actual setting will be (as described in Step 1). Mimic this procedure. Many mock-interviews start with a bit of chit-chat between interviewee and colleagues. After the presentation, the evaluation of the presentation starts and blends in with questions and tips on how to improve it. Our advice: have an interview phase and an evaluation phase. The interview phase starts with you being invited to the room, a welcome by the chair, your presentation, Q+A, and ends with you leaving the room. Upon you returning, the evaluation starts. Realism also means that you ideally organize the mock-interview on Webex (if that is the platform of the real interview).
Make it difficult
What questions are you afraid of? What communication styles do you react badly to? What non-verbal cues from the audience make you nervous? Ask the panel members to simulate these so that you can practice the things that frighten you. Also practise the iteration between specific and generic questions. These transitions require you to switch between modes of answering, which is a thing many candidates struggle with on the spot.
Ask for the right feedback
Often mock interviews end up as detailed discussions about the contents of the presentation, your slides, and your answers. Try also to get feedback on the impression you make. This works best if you invite a fly on the wall who does not participate in the interview, but analyses what happens. The majority of the real interview’s panel is not taking part in the Q+A. They are spectators. Ask feedback on the following aspects:
- Contents: is it clear and convincing? Ask for direct feedback. Is there enough science in the talk? Does this example work, or should I use another one?
- Time
- Structure
- Slides
- Verbal and non-verbal communication
- Interaction
- Answering question
Update your Q+A document
Collect the questions you received during your mock interviews and store them in your answer drawers. Ask you mock panel members to help create answers to them that would convince them. Often the best answers to potential questions come from your mock panel members. Also ask for the questions they did not ask during the mock interview. Another tip here: ask your students to write five questions each on post-it notes. This will result questions from unexpected angles.
Stand your ground
Use what is useful for you, and ignore what is not helpful. What worked for your colleagues does not per se work for you. After all, you are the one who is doing the interview. Stay who you are and stay close to your personal style that works for you.
General rehearsal
Apart from your mock-interviews, you might schedule a general rehearsal with a presentation coach (it is part of our trajectories). The mock-interviews will tell you what are things you can improve, the general rehearsal can provide the safe environment to work on them with a specialist.
During the general rehearsal you give your presentation, you answer questions following the strict format of the interview. It helps you to internalize the process. It is also about the finishing touch. How many answers can you give? What is the average time for the answers? Do you manage to regain controll after loosing it? If challenges arise, there still time to do some experiments.
Timing
Usually two mock-interviews and a general rehearsal are enough. This is a matter of funneling, every step it gets better. The first one will help you to receive feedback that you can use to work a bit extra on those aspects that weren’t there yet. Update your storyline, or slides, or revisit one of the previous steps of this course to further improve your answering techniques. It can be tough, because you get a lot of general feedback. The second mock-interview will be better and the feedback will be more detailed. Progress is shown. Finally a few days before the interview you have the general rehearsal which is a closure of your preparation.